Data Centers are Not the Answer
By Lane Boldman, KCC Director
[Republished from the Kentucky Lantern online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.]
When Kentucky’s biggest data center project eyes a former steel mill in Eastern Kentucky, and one of the few remaining aluminum smelters in the United States is sold for conversion into a data center, it may sound like reuse and reinvestment. But for workers, manufacturers, and Kentucky families who are already navigating rising electric bills, the expansion of data centers raises a deeper question: who really benefits when these facilities move in, and who pays the price?
I attended the July 27 public meeting before the Public Service Commission on the proposed TeraWulf data center at the Hawesville aluminum site, which only sharpened that question. Many attendees raised questions about the new facility’s impact on utility rates and the added noise of a data center operation. Several former Century Aluminum and Big Rivers utility employees stated how they were already struggling with their utility bills and raised concerns about any future expansion of the project beyond what was being presented to them. Several clearly stated: “nobody wants this here.”
Data centers are taking over sites that could still support manufacturing, and that shift matters. These projects generally bring fewer permanent jobs than the industrial facilities they replace, while doing little to strengthen the local supply chains that manufacturing depends on. For a region built on manufacturing, it marked not just the loss of a facility, but the erosion of an industrial backbone that supports workers, local businesses, and entire communities.
For primary aluminum producers, the problem starts with electricity. The number-one reason aluminum smelters in the U.S. cannot compete is the cost of power, and data centers are now competing for the same scarce electricity at massive scale.
That competition is already shaping Kentucky’s economic future. A new smelter that was supposed to come to Kentucky ultimately went to Oklahoma because Oklahoma had the clean energy infrastructure to support it, while Kentucky did not. In a survey conducted by Industrious Labs in Kentucky last year, the majority of respondents actually wanted the new smelter to be built in their state — and they wanted it because of the jobs the smelter would provide. Supporters of a new smelter also said they preferred it over a new data center.
That loss should be a warning: if Kentucky cannot offer affordable, reliable clean power, it will keep losing industrial investment.
Ratepayers are right to be worried. Communities across Kentucky are pushing back against data center build-out because they do not want new facilities to drive up household electricity bills or leave existing customers paying for new power infrastructure. Those concerns are not abstract; they are about whether families, farms, small businesses, and manufacturers will be stuck covering the costs of a grid built to serve the biggest users first.
That is why Kentucky needs a different path. Local governments and state leaders should invest more in clean energy and grid capacity so manufacturers like primary aluminum producers can compete on a level playing field. Cleaner, renewable energy can also deliver health benefits by reducing pollution and harmful environmental impacts caused by data centers while supporting the long-term industrial jobs that sustain communities.
The choice is not between progress and stagnation. It is between an economy that works for a few large power buyers and one that works for the people who live and work in Kentucky.
Kentucky should not let its future be decided by who can buy the most electricity at the highest rate. It should invest in the energy system that keeps manufacturing alive, protects ratepayers, supports public health and environmental safety, and builds stronger local economies.
More on the TerraWulf Data Center Project in the Kentucky Lantern
Roadless Rule could Impact the Gorge- Trump Action Could Allow Roads, Logging
See Louisville Courier-Journal article HERE
“….In Kentucky, the U.S. Forest Service roadless inventory includes only one piece of forest: the 2,800 acre Wolfpen tract in the Cumberland District of Daniel Boone National Forest, just north of Chimney Top Rock, a popular scenic overlook. The land borders the Red River and intersects with the 340-mile Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail….”
Help KCC build the outdoor recreation advocacy network!
The Kentucky Conservation Committee is partnering with our friends at Explore Kentucky to build a statewide database of organizations, businesses, agencies and community partners working in conservation, outdoor recreation, advocacy and outdoor access. Our goal is to make it easier to find one another, build partnerships, pursue funding, support local communities, and strengthen Kentucky’s lands, waters and outdoor economy. Use this link to help us build a stronger statewide network.